Rann means battle. And battle is a fight between large organized forces. In the context of a civil society and its seep complexities, large organized forces (read news channels, political parties and industrial czars) are not just involved in a fight with each other, but more importantly and frighteningly. They are battling a war within themselves and this especially true of news channels.
Making news is not the easiest thing in the world. So the next best thing obviously would be to make anything and everything appear to be news.
The ways the news is presented today are much more entertaining than family soaps and thrillers. What’s worse is that we enjoy this kind presentation so much that we have got addicted to them.
There is the government – a system which runs the country, then there are wealth creators like industrialists etc and then there are politicians in the ruling party and the opposition.
All the above in a democratic society are supposed to be working for the common people and the one and only means of the common people having any idea as to what those are up to is through the media. Hence the media had been invented as a truth telling machinery serving the purpose of the common people so that they know they are in good hands on in case they are told that they are not, they can hope to exercise the power of their vote to bring about a change.
But in a free economy system where there is so much competition the media by default is lost in its purpose.
The media is a reporting agency. It reports news. News is what is new in what you hear for the first time so to be able to be the first to tell you the various newspapers and channels have an intense competition among themselves and this they do on a need to survive, on an ego to be on the top and on a greed to get rich.
To be ahead of competition means more circulation and higher TRPS which in turn generate more and more ad revenue which will translate into making more and more and more money.
Also the fact that the process the people who run the media realize their power of influencing the common people inevitably makes them power hungry.
Rann would exposes the behind-the-scenes truth of how a truth telling machinery by the very virtue of its positioning has no choice but to corrupt it lf it is to become a money-making and power-brokering enterprise.
It’s both sad and comforting to know that, on the other side of the world, people are as distrustful of the mainstream media as they are in America.
Rann (“Battle”) explores news organizations’ struggle for ratings supremacy and their ability to steer public opinion based on their coverage of news stories.
Amitabh Bachchan stars as Vijay Hashvardan Malik, a TV news pioneer who prides himself on truthfulness. As Vijay’s network loses advertisers to rivals that engage in tabloid journalism, his son, Jay (Sudeep), struggles to convince him to add more sensationalism to the network’s broadcasts.
With the network’s financial trouble widely known, Jay’s brother-in-law, Naveen (Rajat Kapoor), proposes to Jay a plan to save the network: favorable coverage of a shady politician named Mohan Pandey (Paresh Rawal) in exchange for advertising dollars from Naveen’s company.
Jay conveniently comes into possession of a video that tarnishes the reputation of Pandey’s main political rival. Jay convinces his father to broadcast the video in the name of truthfulness, and suddenly the network’s financial problems disappear.
A new reporter at the network, Purab (Ritesh Deshmukh), grows suspicious and investigates the politician’s story. What he discovers shakes his faith in the industry and in Vijay, the man who inspired him to become a journalist.
The collusion between the industrialists, politicians and networks is eerie and believable. Bachchan and Deshmukh are quietly effective as a pair of idealists who come to realize that they’re playing a rigged game. Rahwal is especially creepy as Pandey, who laughs off the bloodshed he inflicts as though it were a natural part of politics.
[I have a question for any Indian readers: Pandey is flanked by bodyguards who openly carry machine guns. I've seen this in other Hindi movies as well. Do politicians in India really travel with such visibly heavily armed guards? Just curious.]
Despite the universal appeal of the story, Western audiences may struggle with poorly translated English subtitles. The subtitles also occasionally get lost against background shots of news programs with moving crawls at the bottom of the screen.
I’ve only seen two of Ram Gopal Varma’s films, but it’s clear that he’s an auteur with a distinct style and a love of filmmaking technique. In fact, I’d say he suffers from an over-reliance on camera technique. His cameras constantly swoop for dramatic effect and zoom in for close-ups of the actors’ faces. On those rare occasions when the camera is static, it’s positioned underneath a glass coffee table, or the shot is framed by an actor’s foot resting on said coffee table. Gopal Varma also inserts hilariously over-the-top musical cues to alert the audience whenever anything of import happens.
I found these directorial tics distracting in Gopal Varma’s Sarkar Raj, and they bugged me in Rann, as well. Rann’s plot is riveting and so well acted that I wanted to focus on the story, not on the cinematography. With a story this good, we in the audience know how we’re supposed to feel without the aid of directorial gimmicks.
During my recent visit to Mumbai, I happened to catch the movie that Economic Times is touting as one of the most entertaining films of the decade – “3 Idiots”. And I agree. It is refreshing movie, very different from the standard romantic/gangster fare. While being highly entertaining, it deftly throws light on some of the problems with the education system and attitude of the society at large towards education. Being a product of the education system in India, I could certainly identify with much of what is depicted in the movie. Watching it reminded me of first verse of the Pink Floyd song Another Brick in the Wall (you can listen to it on Lala.com):
We don’t need no education
We don’t need no thought control
No dark sarcasm in the classroom
Teachers leave them kids alone
Hey! Teachers! Leave them kids alone!
All in all it’s just another brick in the wall.
All in all you’re just another brick in the wall.
Incidents in the movie certainly evoke references to “thought control” and “dark sarcasm in the classroom” – although I think the song is a bit extreme in that it seems to denounce education altogether.
In short, the movie highlights how the present system suppresses individuality and stifles creativity. It rightly also illustrates that there is an upside – the perfect product of the system (Chatur Ramalingam), represented more as a caricature, while perhaps not fulfilling his full potential actually does quite well for himself and so does the bottom-of-the-list product (Raju Rastogi).
A side note on the ragging – urinating on live wire/bulb – shown in the movie. During my college days, I had heard about ragging episodes where seniors would force freshers to urinate on a naked wire connected to a 9V battery. That would cause a (mild?) shock to run through you-know-where. However, I was appalled by the urinating on live wire/bulb shots in the movie. Given the popularity of the movie, I wouldn’t be surprised if someone tried this out either on himself or others. I think it is downright dangerous and if the wire were connected to a regular power supply it could maim or even kill a person. They should have included a “don’t try this at home” warning!
All in all, I give this movie 5/5 stars. If you haven’t seen it yet, please make it a point to do so.
Already Mumbai roads are prone to traffic jams. But when the traffic jam is brought about unwillingly, the people lose their good temper. Recently, during rush hour, Vidhu Vinod Chopra caused a traffic jam on St Paul’s Road in Bandra.
Chopra took a trip to St Paul’s Road on January 18. His security guards blocked the road for about 10-12 minutes and didn’t allow anyone to use the road. Chopra then came from the wrong side of the road and only when he drove away were the others permitted to use the road.
Another famous director who happened to be there at that time was surprised by this. He expresses that while this kind of road block is done by politicians, it was shocking to know how Chopra blocked the road like that. And as there weren’t any traffic policemen there, he had free reign to do whatever he liked.
One of the reasons why I cut down on my film viewing drastically in the last couple of years was to do with the alarming consistency with which new films managed to bore me. I didn’t know (and still don’t) whether it was a function of me growing older, or of more bad films being made. Either way, when I decided that I’d go back to the old ways of movie viewing in 2010, I knew it won’t be an easy ride. And it certainly hasn’t been so far, with Chance Pe Dance giving way to Veer.
I didn’t find Veer boring. And that’s probably because I found it unintentionally funny. Veer also taught me a few things that will come in handy if I were to ever consider making a film:
1. If you are Salman Khan, you can come drunk to the shoot and read your lines to the camera, to the extent you inebriated state allows you. The editor can then use long shots or reactions on parts where you slurred too much.
2. Dialouges like “Jahan se pakadta hoon, paanch ser gosht nikal deta hoon” will not work even if they are said 15 times. Hence, it is important that they are acted out (after being said 15 times, mind you), with the hero pulling out someone’s spleen and saying in his parting shot: “Tol lena, paanch ser hi hoga.”
3. Bad Bollywood screenwriters think alike. So within a year, we have two evil characters will a metal hand. In Himesh’s Karzzzz, Sir Juda’s silver hand was also his communicator. In Veer, Jackie Shroff’s golden hand has gold rings and bracelets. At one point, our hero pulls it out of its slot with vengeance, in full public view, only for someone to later comment: “He (Jackie) is such a sport. His had came out by accident and yet he didn’t say anything.”
4. If you break up with your girl in real life, you can get her look-alike to romance you on screen. Since there is only one Katrina Kaif, you can settle for a chubbier version. And then to make the chubbiness seem less obvious, cover her up with gloves, socks and as many pieces of clothing as you can possibly find.
5. All Britishers actually know random Hindi words. It allows them to use “paseena” in the middle of a long diatribe against Indians, spoken otherwise in English. And the word “paseena” is then the perfect cue for our hero, who till now was speaking in his uniquely accented English, to break into heavy duty archaic Hindi. Every word of which the paseena-man obviously understands.
6. If you have a “big twist” moment in your film, you can drive the message home by freezing frames when the big twist is revealed. But the freeze frames have to be dramatic as well. So they should include things like a man in mid-air over a bonfire, and an item girl in the middle of a suggestive pose.
7. You can kill your hero in the climax, and yet have a happy ending to the film by showing him being reborn as his own son. This way, your star officially gets a double role, and your heroine can appear in white hair and glasses, and claim she also played a mother in her debut film.
Title: The Rough Guide to Bollywood: The Glitz, the Glamour, the Soundtrack
Artist: Compiled by DJ Ritu
Date: 2002
After listening to this CD, I realized that just as there is no such thing as one kind of “Hollywood music,” there is no such thing as one kind of Bollywood music. This CD is a survey of music in Bollywood over the years from the 1970s to 2000s.
Not all of the music appealed to me; I guess growing up with Western music kind of biased my ears against high pitched nasal singing, and some of the riffs just simply sounded tacky to me. However, after listening to the CDs a few times, the songs kind of grow on you.
Best tracks:
Track 7: Yeh Dosti Hum Nahin
This is the first ever male duet in Bollywood history for the movie Sholay, a “Curry Western.” It begins with some motifs that sounded almost “sci fi” movie to me, but then it moves into a decidedly western motif with a beautiful melody that evokes wide open spaces where cattle roam.
Track 8: Aap Jaise Koi
Begins a little tacky for me, but then Nazia Hassan’s voice comes in with a very beautiful melody. According to the liner notes, this is the “Indian equivalent of Abba’s ‘Dancing Queen.’” From the movie Qurbani.
Track 10: Tujhe Dekha To
Lata Mangeshkar sings an intriguing melody that’s hard to get out of your head. From the movie Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge.
Track 11: Kehna Hi Kya
One of the more creative beginning I’ve heard … it’s a rhythmic, tabla-accompanied, harmony of female voices which falls into the background as Chitra’s voice soars in. The first big break for Chitra and for composer A.R. Rahman. From the movie Bombay.
Track 14: Ek Pal Ka Jeena
A good dance song that begins with a steady almost Persian-dance kind of beat, followed by pan flutes, and Lucky Ali’s voice. This song has elements of techno pop, electronica, and 70s brass. Just a fun song. From the movie Kaho Naa…Pyaar Hai.
Track 15: Phir Bhi Dil Hai Hindustani
Excellent dance song with a good tabla-based beat. Very catchy melody with the words, “Still my heart is Indian.” From the film Phir Bhi Dil Hai Hindustani.
Krishna’s remarks on terror attacks ‘immature’: Pakistan
PTI 4 hours ago
It is “an immature statement”, Pakistan foreign office spokesman Abdul Basit said while reacting to external affairs minister S M Krishna’s reported remarks that any future terror attack on India could impact bilateral ties.
* Can’t guarantee against repeat of 26/11: Gilani | Video
* IPL row: Pak cancels EC delegation’s visit to India
* All terrorists who stormed Taj were Indians: Kasab
National Film Awards: Priyanka gets best actress, ‘Antaheen’ is best film
AGENCIES
Actress Priyanka Chopra bagged her first National Award for her performance in ‘Fashion’ at the 56th National Film Awards for 2008. Upendra Limaye was awarded best actor for Marathi film ‘Jogwa’.
* God is kind: Priyanka Chopra
* I&B seeks to revamp film awards, IFFI
The Blair snitch project: CIA, FBI seek foreign hands
CHIDANAND RAJGHATTA 8 minutes ago
There’s nothing secret or subtle about it. The US is seeking spies, informers, linguists and analysts from immigrant communities in the country to diversify its intelligence work force and tackle national security challenges.
* TOI newsletter: Latest news delivered to your inbox
Priyanka Chopra wins National Award
Priyanka Chopra wins National Award
‘Minors molested by NGO staff’
Celebrity dress disasters
Presidents & Precedents
Stars in Calendar
Most envied bodies
More
Photos »
More
Videos »
OTHER TOP STORIES
* Special Coverage: Indian Republic Soaring@60
* India should be ready for more attacks: Antony | Video
* Aarti after azaan: Breaking Hindu-Muslim barriers
* Lift veil for voter ID, SC tells burqa-clad women
* Follow us on Twitter for TOI top stories
* Michael Douglas uses Viagra to boost sex life
* Will I be surprised this Valentine’s Day?
* No films for Asin?
More from Top Stories »
* LATEST
NEWS
* MOST
READ
* MOST
SHARED
* MOST
COMMENTED
* Uttar Pradesh government employees call off indefinite strike
* Barack Obama vows to stand up against special interest groups
* Winter chill continues in northern region, toll touches 521
* Supreme Court challenges HC verdict bringing CJI under RTI ambit
More »
Aman Ki Asha
SPORTS
* India look to blank Bangladesh 2-0
* Pakistan end India’s title defence at U-19 World Cup
* Federer eases into fourth round of Australian Open
* Indian team deserves number one place: Hadlee
More from
sports
»
CITY
* R-Day: Air bases near Delhi put on alert
* Row over Rahul’s Goa varsity visit
* L N Mittal drives into Mumbai RTO to get licence
* Businessman shot dead in Delhi
More from Cities »
INDIA
* Shiv Shankar Menon takes over as NSA
* Udaipur: Newborn dies after docs cut her arm
* Four killed in Naxal blast in Orissa
* Telangana agitation at AP Secretariat; 50 held
More from
india
»
WORLD
* Haiti calls off search for quake victims
* Prosecutors quiz Japan ruling party ‘don’
* Joe Biden visits Iraq amid election row
* Britain raises terror threat level to ’severe’
More from
world
»
TIMES BLOGS
* Shobhan Saxena: The ‘Avatars’ that scare China
* Rajesh Kalra: IPL franchisees right in ignoring Pak players
* Jug Suraiya: Undo the paperwork
* Bachi Karkaria: The dying of the light
More from
times blogs
»
BIZ
* Maruti Suzuki’s Q3 net profit triples
* Spectrum auction to fetch Rs 25,000cr: Raja
* Sensex snaps 4-week winning streak
* Google co-founders to sell 5m shares each
More from
biz
»
MARKET
ET Portfolio Wizard.
Convert Rs. to
More from Market »
TECH
* Best tech CEOs of the decade
* Twitter disables widgets over security flaw
* China slams US criticism of Internet control
* 10 Hotels techies will love
More from
tech
»
HEALTH & FITNESS
* Dark chocolate helps beat the blues
* ‘Surya-Namaskar’ goes global
* Driving impairs ability to speak, hear
* Viagra’s potential discovered by accident
More from
health & fitness
»
SPECIALS
* Jyoti Basu: Last Salaam To A Legend
* Aman ki Asha
More from
specials
»
ENVIRONMENT
* Pachauri admits mistake in IPCC report, rules out resignation
* Last decade warmest ever: NASA
More from
environment
»
SCIENCE
* Key to in vitro success? Rock the embryos
* ‘Mideast farmers seeded ancient Europe’
More from
science
»
LIFE & STYLE
What’s your relationship secret?
What’s your relationship secret?
* 5 men all women need
* Stop that stroke
* Can jealousy ruin a relationship?
More from
life & style
»
WOMEN
Kajol: Smile, it’s ageless
Kajol: Smile, it’s ageless
* Best love and war movies ever
* Desi jalwa for the soul
* Discover your personality
More from women»
OPINION
* COMMENT: All’s Well That Sells Well
* TOPT ARTICLE: Adding Value To Education
* TIMES VIEW: Oscars aren’t everything
* COUNTERVIEW: Culture no barrier to great cinema
More from
opinion
»
SUNDAY TOI
* Uncle Sam’s pet: Tail wags the dog
* Why does Pakistan need F-16s to fight Taliban?
* Pride and Prejudice: How ‘Bihari’ became a ‘gaali’
* ‘I allowed myself to be used but now I will be selfish’
More from
sunday toi
»
LEISURE
Cartoons
Cartoons Crossword
Crossword Gaming
Gaming
AUTO
* Review: Royal Enfield Bullet Classic 500
* Safety tips to drive this foggy season
* Review: VW Beetle
* Maruti hike car prices
More from
auto
»
MY TIMES, MY VOICE
* Do you think hike in fares will discourage people from using buses?
* Can you suggest measures to make Road Safety Week meaningful?
* Will netaspeak like that of Deve Gowda put off young persons from joining politics?
* Should cops launch a drive against jaywalking?
More from My Times,My Voice »
PHOTOS
Navya ties the knot
Navya ties the knot Ritu’s collection launch
Ritu’s collection launch Hot debuts in 2010
Hot debuts in 2010
More from Photos »
VIDEOS
Priyanka wins National Award
Priyanka wins National Award Shilpa hits back at Pak over IPL
Shilpa hits back at Pak over IPL Amrita at Pune Fashion Week
Amrita at Pune Fashion Week
More from Videos »
ENTERTAINMENT
Padma Lakshmi beats Ash
Padma Lakshmi beats Ash
* God is kind: Priyanka
* Vivek: After you, Abhishek
* Bobby Darling’s unfaithful beau
Reviews: Veer | New York I love you | Zombieland
Previews: Clash of “The Titans” | Rann |
More from Entertainment »
HOT ON THE WEB
In pics: Beyonce flaunts her curves
In pics: Beyonce flaunts her curves
* 90 lashes for using mobile!
* Shahid’s lucky lips
* ‘Endorsing Gujarat, not Modi’
More from Hot On The Web»
ITIMES
Pics: Wackiest sign boards
Pics: Wackiest sign boards
* 3 mistakes of your life?
* Dealing with partner tantrums?
* Blog: ‘He wore red pants’
Director Gaurav Pandey has pulled off a casting coup of sorts. For the very first time one can see the father-son duo, Mithun Chakraborty and Mimoh Chakraborty feature together in a Hindi film titled Spaghetti 24/7. And this is not all. Spaghetti 24/7 also sees Mimoh’s younger brother Rimoh as an assistant to the director as well. The film is scheduled to hit the theatres sometime in May, 2010.
EXCERPTS:
What is Spaghetti 24/7 all about?
It is a story about a group of people who work in the same bar, called Spaghetti 24/7. It is all about how everyone at some point or the other tries to deceive and upstage the rest of them.
Your brother Rimoh is also assisting Gaurav, the director of the film. How does it feel?
Oh, it feels great. I am eagerly waiting for the day when he would cast me in his films too (smile).
You will also be sharing the screen space with your dad, Mithun Chakraborty. Did you ever get intimidated while shooting with him?
Yes, of course. I was really nervous. Although we have only a few scenes together, it was scary till we shot the first scene. After that, it was great.
But don’t you think there is a chance of getting overshadowed by Mithun? Being his son is an advantage or a drawback?
I agree, there is a chance of me getting overshadowed, but he’s my dad after all. It has been more of a drawback being Mithun Chakraborty’s son, because audience has a lot of expectations from me and they keep comparing me with him. I think every star kid has to go through that phase and accept it gracefully.
We hear you are playing a negative character in Spaghetti 24/7. Is it true? How did you prepare yourself for the role?
It’ll be wrong to say I’m playing a negative character. But yes, my character has grey shades. And I simply enjoyed performing it, thanks to my director, Gaurav Pandey. He managed to bring out the best in me.
You have undergone a makeover after Jimmy. Has there been a conscious effort?
Yes, it truly was. After Jimmy released, I realised I had many drawbacks and therefore took a year-long-gap to rectify those flaws and make myself close to perfect for for Spaghetti 24/7. One must always try to reinvent yourself, isn’t it?
What do you think you are best at – acting or dancing?
I love to dance and I love to act as well. I have been dancing since I was a Kid and I have just started acting. So I suppose you understand what I mean.
How has your rapport with your co-star Amruta Subhash been?
She is a mind-blowing actress and an excellent human being. She was always chilled out on the sets and we had become the best of friends. Am sure audience will love our chemistry.
Did it dampen your spirits when Jimmy didn’t fare well at the box office?
Of course, it did. But I have learnt a lot from Jimmy and it will always be my first. I have many beautiful memories of it.
Who is your worst critic when it comes to acting – dad or mum?
Dad, any day! He is brutally honest about everything he says which actually scares me. But it is only because of him I have come this far and made myself strong enough to take on any adversity in life.
Who is your favourite heroine in Bollywood you’d fancy working with?
It will certainly be Celina Jaitley. I think she is too beautiful to be true and she is super talented.
Future Projects?
Loot is coming out soon. Besides that, I’m working in three other films. I will tell you only at the right time.
Tomorrow we’ll be presenting our best films of the decade list, and yeah, we’re a few weeks late, but you know what? Fuck off. That’s what.
Now, normally, I don’t like to talk needless shit, but as Benjie Light and I were waxing and musing about various films that we felt deserved to be on this list, we also, of course, were taking a gander at others’ lists. Some of them are really, really interesting. Some… not so much.
If you click over to the trainwreck of a website that is Ain’t It Cool News these days, you can take a look here at the best of the decade lists by one of their regularly featured… I don’t know what you call them. Are they writers? I’ll be charitable and just say: bloggers. Anyway, the fella calls himself “Mr. Beaks.”
Now, there’s some quality films in this list, there really are. In The Mood For Love in the top five? I respect that. You Can Count On Me in the list at all? I can definitely get behind that. There’s two films by Michael Haneke on the list, which is surprising, but I applaud it. WALL-E’s on the list, which is a no brainer, and so are films like The Constant Gardener, which people always told me were good but I never saw. All of this sounds fine.
But the list itself? Deeply flawed. For example, there’s way too Ridley Scott happening here. Way too much. I’m surprised that Peter Berg isn’t on the guy’s list. And Brian De Palma’s Femme Fatale. Seriously. There’s weird caveats as well, like, sure Bad Santa makes it onto the list of top 100 films of the decade, but only the “January 2003 Pasadena Test Screening Cut?” What? That’s ridiculous. Oh, and the that the #100 film is Bring It On, seriously, and the #1 film – and it’s important to note that this appears to be a ranked list – is Irreversible. Which is… wow. Indeed.
Also, here is a list of films that “Mr. Beaks” says “just missed” finding a place on his best of the decade list: The Dark Knight, Juno, May, Closer, Old Joy, Bad Boys 2, Unfaithful, Lovely And Amazing, Unbreakable, Mission To Mars, Humpday, The Prestige, Paranoid Park, and I’m Not There. And The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou. Just consider for a moment that these titles are together in one section, and then think about how they’re good enough to make it onto the best of list. A-mazing.
Then again, this list is perfect for AICN, and their larger than life founder, Harry Knowles, who once deserved mention in early 90s when it came to how film was discussed on the internet, at least upcoming films. Benjamin Light’s been saying it for a while, and maybe he’s right: I don’t think we care about spoilers anymore. Not that AICN has had them for a while. The system merely absorbed them and spit them back out.
Harry Knowles = the anti-Roger Ebert?
So, it just goes without saying: Reviewing anything is a careful process. Take any review with a grain of salt. If you’re reading a review of a film you’ve never seen before, the review should be enlightening, only slightly spoiler-ish, giving you a good tease, and in clear, firm, and smart language, illustrate for you whether this is something you’d like or not, for whatever reason you like or don’t like things. A review for a film you’ve already seen should feel like a conversation with somebody you’ve either just met or feel like someone you’ve known for years. It should be smart, of course, and thoughtful. It should point out things to you and and excite you, and bring you into a conversation you’d be lucky to engage in. Or not. It’s up to you.
Hell, maybe Bring It On is on your 100 best movies of the decade list. SPOILER: I’m pretty sure it’s not on ours.
That said, our 100 Best Films of the Decade list is (most likely) dropping tomorrow. It’s fantastic. Trust me.
Elsewhere…
Who are the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, really?
Joss Whedon could potentially be going to FX.
The new memoir by Patti Smith.
Scientists turn stem cells into pork.
Ben Kingsley in Bollywood.
The 100 greatest sci fi/fantasy novels of all time?
Diamond oceans possible on Uranus and Neptune.
The founder of Taco Bell made a run for the border…
Among many words in the IIT lingo, there is a commonly used one called “arbit”, meaning arbitrary. Based on whims, not on reason. After watching Chance Pe Dance, I thanked God-knows-who for inventing “arbit”, for it fits the film so well, it almost defines it!
There are good films and bad films. Within bad films, there are unintentionally funny bad films and plain boring bad films. And now, there is a new category – Arbit and incoherent bad films. Indeed, Chance Pe Dance (CPD) is not based on anything even remotely coherent. It starts with a random song, has many randomly unconnected sequences put together in some form, and has an equally random closure to a story that didn’t exist to begin with.
For a film that’s meant to be a dance film or a musical, the listless music by Adnan Sami is a shocker. The leads don’t do anything wrong as such. But then, the set-up is so insipid nothing really works for it. This is exactly the film that makes you go – What were they thinking when they were making this?!
I can get into specific areas, but that will really make the bad worse. Check out some of these reviews if you must:
Rajeev Masand’s review
Anupama Chopra’s review
Mayank Shekhar’s review
If (at all) there is an audience for CPD, it is the same as that of board games that come with a “for 5-8 year old” descriptor on them. For the rest of us, watch it you have need to discover new lows of wasting time and money.
PS: The high point of my visit to the theatre was the Rajneeti trailer. Looks very cool.
Year 2009 brought India under the spotlight several times as far as the world stage was concerned.
The success of Slumdog Millionaire showcased some Indian artistes and locales. The word Bollywood was reinforced into world vocabulary and A.R Rahaman was raised to the position of international music stars.
India won another beauty crown when Parvathy Omanakuttan made it as a runner up in the Miss World pageant.
Former Miss India -World Aiswarya Rai who was crowned Miss World in 1994, is still referred to as the world’s most beautiful woman. She was in the world eye when she starred with Steve Martin in Pink Panther 2. What more, she and her husband Abhishek Bachchan came to be called the most popular movie star couple in the world. (And we thought that slot was for Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, didn’t we? But if it was Oprah Winfrey who said that about Abhi-ash, it’s like the modern day gospel word, is it not?)
Eyes turned to the soft-spoken Prime Minister of India when at the G-20 Summit in London, he asked Obama for his autograph (International media found it funny; but what’s wrong? Isn’t Obama a living piece of history?) and when he got the honour of being the guest at the first state dinner hosted by the Obama White House. (Singh should have been in the news a little longer for the discussion he had with Obama during that visit to the US if not for the Salahis who hogged all the news-time and column space for crashing the president’s residence that night of the first state dinner. )
A few years ago, I was at a grand Ganesha festival in Jayangar, Bangalore. The highlight of this religious event was a bunch of talented rubber-spined teenagers dancing to Michael Jackson tracks, and a lot of very good food. Here, a man watches the performance, unaware of a parallel (well, perpendicular) screening of another movie.
Chetan Bhagat’s five point is man-lit that is not even remotely entertaining or funny or… well it isnt quite anything. It’s disappointing. And 3 idiots is certainly mildly entertaining. But I wouldnt say I enjoyed the movie. It is gain just as average as the Chetan Bhagat’s five point someone.
3 idiots at best is loosely based on five point someone. However average and nondescript these two are, the credit should go to Chetan Bhagat. There is no doubt the core plot is lifted from his book. Ofcourse they have made significantly different twists and added a lot more masala to cater to the Indian mass market. The movie also reminds me of Munna bhai MBBS. It has all the active ingredients of a Bollywood movie. There is the token madrasi loser, a muslim family, a christian is thrown in too( who commits suicide btw) and theres the pretty proffesor ki beti. It comes off as being too preachy (and unrealistically so). How many wild life photographers do we really need? just 1 perhaps for a thousand computer proffessionals. And we have all fancied being pilots, authors , directors or painters as a child. How many people really dream to be a boring a engineer or a businessman. Not many I am sure. Most of us would rather work in espionage, solve complex criminal cases or write a magnum opus like Leo Tolstoy. But we hardly have any need for art like we do for applied science or even pure science for that matter. Ofcourse we need art, but not every body with a hint of creativity can write or paint or sculpt for a living. However an average not-so-talented programmer can earn a very decent living. I hope young people do not take these movies seriously and ruin themselves.
In that sense, both five point someone and 3 idiots suck. Ofcourse Chetan Bhagat himself is a glaring example of that. His work sucks, BIG TIME. He is not meant to write trust me. But atleast his book want too preachy. 3 idiots goes way too far in driving home a point that you will feel like puking up a little right in your seats watching the movie.
Still dude, 3 idiots is defintely a movie based on five point someone. I wonder why Amir Khan would go as far to deny that ?
The New Year started off with a B-A-N-G on Radio RockeTalk with our programming resuming after a short break with the best the New Year had to offer: The undesputed king of Indian cinema- the guy who knows the pulse of his audience sooooo well; is easy on the eyes; never goes wrong with the choice of music; picks his scripts selectively and still makes half of India feel ‘a flush comes to to my face and my pulse begins to race… it goes boompty, boompty, boompty, boompty, boom, boom, boom…’ Yes, you are right- Aamir Khan. Well he did it again with his new Bollywood release, 3 Idiots!
Tuesday nights are our very own RJ Ajayr’s night and this time he chose to do a feature or rather a discussion on the 3 Idiots. I must stop right here to tell you that I have not watched the movie yet. Yes, it was screen in San Diego for a couple days and I COULD NOT MAKE IT. Sorry Goldspirt Films. Sorry Vijay and Shalni. Sorry Aamir. But most of all I am sorry for myself
For all you newbies- every evening and sometimes at other times between 9:30pm and till whenever it ends (usually 3 hrs or so) we have fun ‘events’ like a radio talkshow – but different. There are hosts or RJs who introduce the topics and then everyone participates in the discussion. So very unlike Radio or television where things are pretty one sided, this is a live, all inclusive show where everyone can, well, speak up. As RockeTalk is all about the mobile phones, our audiences and participants are on the mobile phones and are from all over the world. From the well connected US to the remote places in India- anyone can particapte or just listen in.
The highlights of this week Tuesday night’s program:
Ragging scene
Kareena Kapoor: The only idiot? Or is it plain jealousy? LOL
Piracy movie – free movie download controvercy
Amir Khan’s excessive bathing
Hello! Is that a problem? Well thats what the guys said any way.. as for us girls… Aamir in see-thru wear… all wet.. any girls saying ‘no’ to that?
Chetan Bhagat controversy
Chotu_Tapori’s birthday
Today’s pick: Mohobbat ki Baatien on Mehfil @ 2:30 and 9:30 pm IST with Shafeeq
Friday night: Bollywood night on Radio RockeTalk @ 10:00pm IST with Pooji
Also recommended: Monday night, Jan 11, 2010- CarTalk: AutoExpo on Radio RockeTalk with Karan and Sin
My wishes are rather belated. This new year’s started off on a rather dull note when Mr. K’s father was hospitalized on New Year’s Eve when he had a slight scare with his heart. Thankfully, things are slowly getting back to normal now, and I am starting to get back to my normal routines.
For some time now, the snubnose like all other kids in India has been obsessed by Bollywood music. She knows the lyrics, songs, and most actors and actresses. Of course, me being the kill-joy mum has to try to divert her attention to more appropriate kind of music- something that does not always work.
One song that both me and the snubnose both enjoy to sing around the house is Aashayein – the song from the very inspiring movie Iqbal about a deaf and dumb boy who tries to get on board the Indian cricket team.
The reason I am posting about this, is because I think this song has a lot of meaning especially during the new year. It’s all about having hopes and dreams, and working towards achieving them.
This blog has the lyrics of the song along with the translation. The translation is a bit clunky. But, I hope you all get the message. I wish you all a very happy new year, where you will work hard and fulfill all the dreams that you have.
I have a feeling in my heart…this year is going to be unlike other years. I don’t know why, but for good or bad, I just know that this year is going to be an impactful one. Hopefully, for the good .
Raat Gayi Baat Gayi: A classy, slice of life affair
Rating: 3.5 out of 5*
Starring: Rajat Kapoor, Vinay Pathak, Neha Dhupia, Irawati Harse Mayadev, Navneet Nishan, Dalip Tahil and Anu Menon
Director: Saurabh Shukla
Advertised hinting the film as the desi version of Hollywood’s 2009 super hit The Hangover, Raat Gayi Baat Gayi is anything but that! But that doesn’t take away the fact that it’s a wonderfully crafted entertaining affair.
It is basically the story of Rahul (Rajat Kapoor) and his wife, Mitali (Iravati Harshe). The couple had, the previous night, attended a party with friends including Saxena (Dalip Tahil) and Amit (Vinay Pathak) and their respective wives, Jolly (Navneet Nishan) and Nandini (Anu Menon). At the party, Rahul had had a drink too many and had been following Sophia (Neha Dhupia), a sexy woman, at the party. The two had escaped to a room upstairs and were about to get naught, but Rahul just cannot remember what happened thereafter and if anything at all happened. Waking up in the morning with a hangover, Rahul is not sure whether his wife knows anything about his one-night stand with Sophia, that is if ever there was one. But his wife is in a foul mood. His friends, Amit and Saxena, don’t make things easy for him. Amit himself is in the midst of a marital crisis because Nandini has thrown him out of his house for cheating on her by prefering online porn over. As for their novelist friend, Saxena, he too has skeletons in his cupboard but he is a smart operator. What funnily shocking revelations tumble out as Rahul goes in search of what exactly happened in the night makes for a fun watch.
Narrated in a non-linear manner by actor cum writer-director Saurabh Shukla, the film is his finest effort as a director. Also, full marks to the production company PNC for delivering what one can truly term a ‘multiplex film’. The production values are of absolute high standards and the setting perfectly upmarket. There is absolutely no sleaze and the adult humour is just what one often hears at the parties. Great one-liners spread across plenty of sequences leave you laughing your guts out. The twist at the end is again a big surprise. The peppy songs are pleasant to the ears and very situational with the Love in C major being the pick of the lot.
A few weeks ago, two Indian guys, just a few years younger than me, approached me in a restaurant to ask me about what life was like in the USA. As we conversed—in their halting English and my even more halting Hindi—I realized that they were particularly interested in one particular issue.
“Is it true that Muslims are discriminated against in America?” one asked.
“Not just Muslims, but everyone with Muslim names,” his friend added.
Now, this question wasn’t too surprising. The media in India often depict the United States as a place of intolerance bordering on hatred toward Muslims.
Sadly, these impressions of America have a fairly substantial grain of truth in them. For example, many Muslims who travel in the United States are detained and questioned at airports. In an irony that almost sounds like it was intentionally engineered to generate publicity for his film, Indian actor Shah Rukh Khan was held for questioning at Newark International Airport just after he finished filming “My Name is Khan”, which is about an innocent Muslim man being aggressively interrogated at an American airport.
Far more troubling, of course, is the fact that hundreds of Muslims were rounded up and imprisoned for years in areas specifically designed to be out of the reach of political or judicial oversight, and many of these people were subjected to an organized program of torture that was officially approved at the very highest levels of the United States government. We now know that a large number, perhaps the majority, of those people had no connections to any militant groups.
So it makes sense that people around the world would have the impression of the United States as a terrible place for Muslims. Of course, the impression is largely false: the United States is actually still a very welcoming place, a place where the average Muslim is far wealthier and has far more political and civil freedoms than the average Muslim in almost any Muslim-majority country in the world. But the global media is far more interested in reporting on the scandalous exceptions than the run-of-the-mill norm.
However, national security demands vigilance, which is where the problems come in. Assume that we could somehow identify whether a particular person is a terrorist with 99.5 percent accuracy. There are around one billion Muslims in the world, and maybe 500 of those are actively plotting to engage in acts of terror. So, if we could identify terrorists with 99.5 percent accuracy, then we would identify 5,000,497 people as terrorists. 497 of those people would be terrorists, and 5 million would be false positives.
That means a whole lot of innocent people being detained and harassed, and perhaps even imprisoned, as well as two or three actual terrorists sneaking through the cracks, maybe by boarding a flight to Detroit on Christmas Day. (This discussion is based in part on a similar discussion in the new book SuperFreakonomics, which is a really fantastic book, despite its silly title.)
Given that reality, it is far too easy to create a narrative of civilizational clash, where the West is seen by Muslims as ruthlessly rounding up innocent Muslims, and Muslims are seen by the West as nothing more than terrorists and terrorist sympathizers. But that narrative is toxic. In the end, it will only deepen tensions and breed the very problems that we are trying to avoid—suspicion, fear, and more acts of terror, rather than fewer.
Can we break this vicious cycle? I suggest that we can, but both sides need to make good-faith attempts to understand the legitimate concerns of the other. The American majority should deeply sympathize with stories of detention and abuse, and seek to limit these costs as much as possible. When it becomes clear that we have made a mistake, we should try to rectify it. For example, why isn’t there a popular political movement in America to offer compensation and an apology to those who were wrongly imprisoned, even if that imprisonment was done in good faith? On the other side, Muslims could try to understand that any attempt to screen out terrorists will be imperfect, and that mistakes are caused not by spite against their religion, but by human fallibility. (It would be easier for them to understand this if those of us from the West toned down our rhetoric and showed more sympathy with the innocent and more outrage at those who committed acts of torture and wrongful imprisonment in our names.)
Unfortunately, the trend toward deepening suspicion and widening the fault lines between cultures is strong. The responsibility is on each of us to break that pattern, to reach out to people who are different from us and do everything in our power to project good will, tolerance, and mutual understanding. There will always be wrongs done, on both sides, but we can choose whether to focus our outrage and energy only on the wrongs of the other side, or whether we should also pay a little attention to the planks in our own eyes as well. It is only through true compassion that the United States can triumph over extremism, by being seen as a city on a hill rather than an evil imperalist power.
Avatar is the unfortunate consequence of taking a large dose of white liberal guilt and adding half a billion dollars overseen by a master of visual style who couldn’t write to save his life. The story deals with humans out to plunder a new found utopia (named Pandora) that is full of a great new mineral, Unobtainium. This name is announced to us very early in the movie, perhaps we are to realize now that Cameron doesn’t really enjoy writing so we should give up now and just sit back and take in the luscious special effects. But this is a long film, and we movie watchers do not live by special effects alone. You cannot help but hear nails on the blackboard every time you hear people say the word with reverence, “Unobtainium!”
The “avatar” in the movie refers to a trance-like state that humans enter when they are asked to “drive” laboratory-made specimens of Pandora’s native people. When they enter this trance, their avatar wakes up and “lives” in the “outside world,” when the avatar goes to sleep, the humans wake up out of the trance and live in the “real world” inside the lab. Pandora is a beautiful world full of lush greenery, wonderful animals, pretty blue people, and plants and trees that are all connected to each other via their roots. It is a wonderfully imagined world in which one can lose oneself, one imagines repeated watchings of the movie would reveal new rich detail that one had previously missed, the effort that went into the design of this world is obvious. The viewer is easily lost in this beauty, almost trance-like one might say, until he hears a clunker of a line and is jarred back into the harsh reality of an especially poorly written Hollywood blockbuster.
We recommend that this movie be watched in Imax 3-D, preferably with the sound turned off. As a spectacle this movie has no peers. It reminded us of the first time we watched Toy Story, or the Matrix, or even, Terminator 2, each of those times we left the movie theater feeling as if we had just participated in a very moving experience, but even those movies are not a scratch on Avatar’s beauty. With a less obvious plot and better writing, Avatar could have made our list of greatest movies of the decade, as it is, it makes the grade of movies that must be watched, but once only.
Many people have written quite eloquently about the obvious anti-imperialist white-guilt message of the movie. We have but one thing to add. Not all societies plundered by the white man were like the native Americans. That is all.
Sita Sings the Blues is available for high quality download on a Creative Commons license on the film maker’s website. In a world of poor-quality torrents downloaded by eager yet thrifty flat-screen-TV-owning movie buffs, that alone would qualify it for a dekko. It is the story of Sita from the Ramayana, told with a fixation on Sita’s point of view. The movie is animated by Nina Paley who inserts her own story in parallel, one of having her heart broken by a man who leaves her for good when he gets a job in India. The animation is of varying quality, sometimes it is represented by Mughal-era and other ancient Indian paintings speaking the lines of Rama, Sita and so on, sometimes in crude drawings of a South Park like quality, and at other times by an impossibly curvy Sita and equally impossibly muscular Rama doing their Bollywood-inspired movie singing to the backup blues-vocals of Annette Hanshaw. But at all times the animation works. All along, the story of Sita (and Rama and the rest of the Ramayana cast) is told by apparently India-born youth trying to recollect as best as they can the story of the Ramayana, interspersed with musings on a childhood story by adults as they try to mine hidden-depths and back-stories of an ill-remembered epic. A certain irreverence permeates the movie, but it never descends to crude parody or atheistic preaching. Mostly it sounds like the story of the Ramayana as would be discussed by Indian youth today when they are sure their parents are out of earshot. The movie comes with an incredibly beautiful soundtrack. Almost all the songs are by Annette Hanshaw whose turn of the early-20th-century songs seem to have been written precisely for use in this movie. One of those that are not by her, the Rama-praising song sung by Lava and Kusha is comedic genius. We hummed it for days afterward.
For those of us of a certain age, the Channel-V promotions featuring Quick Gun Murugan hold a special place in our hearts. The 30-second parodies of Westerns, Rajnikanth, and south Indians in general made in the service of our MTV variant captured perfectly the adolescent zeitgeist of early 90s India. We were very excited when Quick Gun the movie was released and finally got a chance to watch it recently. The film delivers on every count: as a rich parody of Tamil and other South Indian films, as a parody of Westerns and most of all as a way to lose yourself for an hour and a half in well written and almost always well executed comedy. Dr Rajendra Prasad is brilliant as Quick Gun Murugan, he even manages to parody himself very effectively. Both Sita and Quick Gun are well-timed reminders that one does not need a lot of money to make a great movie just good writing, good acting, and a lot of imagination.